THE REPUBLICAN QUEEN
In the magnificent twenty volume Oxford English Dictionary, the words Chief Magistrate are used to describe both the Queen, and the President of the United States. English is a very flexible language, but how on earth can a Queen who is a hereditary Sovereign, and an Elected President be described as the same or even in the same breath. It is really quite easy. By a war the Citizens of America, replaced a King, who would not extend the privileges and responsibilities, of a Bible believing leader to every citizen without discrimination, with an elected official who subscribed to the Protestant belief, that the Holy Bible is the ultimate Law.
With one short exception, the few short Kennedy years, every President of the United States has been a Protestant Christian. The United States adopted and maintained the laws of England, applied capriciously by the English King, to his American Colonies, and wrote into their American Constitution a guarantee that if any matter involved more than $20 then the judges on the case would be a jury. Jewish Americans hate this worse than poison, because the Judge in Jewish Law is a Rabbi. Islamic Americans hate this law too because under their law, the judge is a Cadi or Mullah, and can only hold office if familiar with the Islamic Q’uran. Why has Australia departed from this tried and trusted method of settling disputes? Certain Roman Catholic Americans, while subscribing to the Jewish sentiments about juries, preferring to have a Priest as their intercessor and Judge, have accepted it as unchangeable. We as Australians have been misled and deceived, for over forty years, by lawyers, who exercise a monopoly on Statutory Interpretation. You should learn the basics, so you know when you are being deceived.
A Republican Sovereign, as every King and Queen of England has been since 1688, accepts Almighty God as the Ultimate Sovereign. The Republican President of the United States also has a duty to accept this, and the big jury of the United States People expects allegiance to Almighty God in their President. Elsewhere on this website you will find the Coronation Oath 1688 ( Imp) posted. You will also find an extract from Halsbury’s Laws of England (3rd Edition) on the Royal Prerogative. Of historical note, the same prerogative is vested in the Governors of the independent States making up the United States of America, and in the President. The class of individuals, making up no more that point two five of one percent of the population, but forming a disproportionate membership of the Parliaments, have for forty years in Australia, not been teaching these basic facts, to those who would enter their profession, or those in it.
Everyone has a story to tell about a stupid lawyer. They can survive for years. A stupid engineer cannot survive. His bridges fall down, his buildings will crumble, his water works will fail, so we cannot afford a stupid engineer, and cause and effect quickly end their careers, usually with many deaths. Likewise a stupid doctor; the results are quickly obvious. Stupid lawyers cause lots of deaths, in fact seven a day, because when hope leaves so does a will to live, and that is the number of suicides in Australia today, tomorrow, and the next day. If cars or drinking killed that many a day they would both be banned.
Why are they stupid. Stupidity can coexist with cunning. It can coexist with deceit. It cannot coexist with honesty. Elsewhere on this website you will find a condensed course on Statutory Interpretation, and a précis of the process from the Late Justice Lionel Murphy. ( The Judicial Process). Today in 2008, we have an enormous amount of conflicting law. We have State Laws contradicting Federal Laws. We have Federal Laws contradicting the Constitution. We have public officials who refuse to accept the written Word. Is that Stupid, or what? We also have a mechanism in place in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 ( Cth) which should mandate how we read Acts. It is ignored. Is that stupid?
In 1900, when a matter was to be tried, consent was required from both parties for a Judge to decide questions of fact. When any individual was upset at an Act of Parliament, he or she could have it tried, in a Court of Law, with a jury, and tossed out, or confirmed, by twelve impartial and highly educated laymen, called together as a Special Jury. Was it stupid to repeal that law? If a law is not “good government” , should it not be indicted and tried? You be the judge.
Elsewhere on this website you will find as you explore its nooks and crannies, an extract from Broom’s Maxims, described as the collected wisdom of centuries. They derive from numerous jury trials, conducted in England, Australia and America, and prophesy a likely outcome to a given set of circumstances. We all want to know what is round the next corner, so the abolition of reliance on maxims that come as a result of jury trials, drives people round the bend. Elsewhere on this website you will also find an Extract, from Craies on Statute Law, dealing with Penal Actions. You should read it, and ask your favourite lawyer, why these are no longer permitted to be filed or action-ed. Is it stupid to have a law, and no way of enforcing it? Your verdict?
Not only do we have no way of enforcing the law, as individuals, egomaniacs in Parliament have made it impossible. The first lawyer egomaniac in Australia was Sir Robert Menzies. He set about to cut the manliness out of the High Court. He vasectomised the High Court by Order 58 Rule 4 Subrule 3, High Court Rules in 1952, and Lord help any public servant that let another Communist Party Case be filed. The Federal Supreme Court as a “court” free and open to everyone was abolished by a simple Rule. Illegal Yes. Contemptible Yes, Disgraceful Yes, and completely disregarding S 77 (i) Constitution. In fact sweeping away all of Chapter III Constitution, because a “Court” as a stand alone word, does not even get a mention in Ch III.
Why is it illegal? Because, Section 24AA Crimes Act 1914 ( Cth) defines it as “Treachery”. What is treachery? ( Oxford Dictionary: p 1360; Being Treacherous: violating allegiance; betraying trust; perfidious; not to be relied on.) Without free and unimpeded access as exists in the United States of America to the Royal Prerogative of Justice of Almighty God vested in a Royal Delegate, who knows his job and responsibilities, NO REPUBLIC CAN SUCCEED. It is not revolution, but it is sabotage. Sabotage of the Constitution, has been the stock in trade of lawyers for over forty years. The good moral lawyers leave the profession. Some enter Parliament with a view to reform. More enter to continue the sabotage. Most will sell their souls like Judas Iscariot to the devil, for forty pieces of silver, and take Judgeships under the State. They pay no homage to Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second. You are a person who can call them to account. Almighty God needs people like you. He works through his humble servants.
Keep on fossicking around in this mullock heap, and the nuggets of know how, and wisdom will emerge, and you can be a servant of the Republican Queen, and Almighty God in the Republic we inherited from 1900. YOU are authorized by the Parliament of the Commonwealth to be a Commonwealth public official. Start getting qualified and educated here to perform your duty to God and Country. admin@community-law.net